Analytical Techniques: Classical Wet Analytical Chemistry
Thomas R. Dulski, Carpenter Technology Corporation
|
General Use |
|---|
|
- Quantitative elemental composition analysis |
|
- Qualitative identification of material type |
|
- Qualitative detection of component moieties |
|
- “Umpire” check on quantitative instrumental methods |
|
- Isolation and characterization of inclusions and phases |
|
- Characterization of coatings and surfaces |
|
- Determination of oxidation state |
|
Examples of Applications |
|
- Quantitative determination of alloy matrix elements for which instrumental methods are unavailable or unreliable |
|
- Complete characterization of a homogeneous sample for use as an instrument calibration standard |
|
- Quantitative determination of composition when sample is too small or of unsuitable shape for instrumental approaches |
|
- Gross average composition determination of inhomogeneous samples |
|
- Isolation of compounds and stoichiometric phases from metal alloy matrices for compositional analysis or examination by instrumental techniques |
|
- Coating weight determination of plated metals, lubricant films, and other surface layers |
|
- Partitioning of element oxidation states |
|
- Sorting of mixed materials based on qualitative detection of one or more key matrix components |
|
Samples |
|
- Form: Crystalline or amorphous solids (metals, ceramics, glasses, ores, and so on) and liquids (pickling and plating bats, lubricants, and so on) |
|
- Size: Depends on extent of required analyses—generally 1 to 2 g per element for solids and 20 mL total for process liquids, although requirements vary widely with technique |
|
- Preparation: Solids are milled, drilled, crushed, or similarly dissociated into particles typically 2 mm (0.08 in.) in diameter or smaller. Machined alloys are solvent degreased. Materials lacking high order homogeneity require special care to ensure a representative laboratory sample |
|
Limitations |
|
- Slow compared to alternate instrumental techniques |
|
- Except in rare cases, relatively large sample weights are required |
|
Estimated Analysis Time |
|
- 2 to 80 h per element (8 h per element is typical) |
|
Capabilities of Related Techniques |
|
- X-ray spectrometry: Rapid for major component elements with Z>9 |
|
- Optical emission spectroscopy: Can be rapid for minor and trace components |
|
- Atomic absorption spectrophotometry: Somewhat more rapid; better ultimate detection limits for trace components |
|
- Atomic absorption spectrophotometry: Somewhat more rapid; better ultimate detection limits for trace components |
Reprinted with permission of ASM International®.
Latest Resources
- April 2, 2008 - Glass Vial Sprinkler Accidents – If any of your sprinklers has a glass vial please read on since this article discusses the unexpected release of an enormous amount of water when one of these sprinklers trips.
- April 1, 2007 - Embrittlement of Steels – Practical advice on the embrittlement of steels and new steels that can enhance the performance of critical mechanical parts.
- May 1, 2006 - Hydrolysis of Fiberglass – Hydrolysis Failures of Fiberglass: delamination, blistering & bleeding.
- June 1, 2005 - High Cycle Fatigue
Latest Newsletters
- April 1, 2008 - Nuts & Bolts, Volume 25 – Glass Vial Sprinkler Accidents & Passivation
- April 1, 2007 - Nuts & Bolts, Volume 24 – Embrittlement of Steels
- May 1, 2006 - Nuts & Bolts, Volume 23 – Hydrolysis of Fiberglass
- June 1, 2005 - Nuts & Bolts, Volume 22 – High Cycle Fatigue
